The V8 engine – once commonplace, always loved – is a dying breed. We champion the normally aspirated V8 and soak up its appeal before it’s too late
Andrew Frankel Autocar
3 November 2018

Sometimes, certain things catch on not because they are insuperably better than anything else but because they just seem to make a little more sense. Hence the rise of the V8 engine – a baby bear’s porridge of an engine configuration if ever there were one.

For on paper, at least, there is nothing that readily explains why the V8 was so spectacularly popular that it effectively came to power an entire continent. There is no black magic here, no killer consequence to arranging two pairs of four conrods on a crankshaft, usually (but not always) at a 90-degree angle to each other.

The truth is somewhat simpler. Which is that when the V8 really started to catch on in America in the 1930s, it was because that was the cylinder count that provided what customers wanted in terms of power and smoothness without those things they did not, such as needless complexity, expense and inconvenient external dimensions. And it was on such a prosaic basis that what I would contend was the world’s favourite engine configuration was born.

Our Verdict

Ford Mustang V8 Fastback

The Ford Mustang is available in the UK in right-hand drive for the first time, but does the rest of this American muscle car fit the UK car scene?

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

Of course, we don’t think about V8s that way at all. When we think about V8s, we think about one thing above all others: that noise. We all know it when we hear it. There are actually some quite august treatises published in erudite engineering journals that seek to explain exactly what it is about that burble that we find so appealing. They talk about pulses, tones and phases, irregular firing intervals and so on. There doesn’t seem to be much they can agree on, though.

The only common thread apparently linking them all is that, ultimately, no one really seems to know. Or maybe I just don’t know how to read and interpret such lofty literature, and maybe I don’t need to: I have absolutely no idea why the sausages I buy from my local butcher taste better than sausages I buy anywhere else. I just know they do, and that, surely, is enough.

 

It certainly was earlier today as I was threading my way across rural Wales in the newly revised Ford Mustang, its 444bhp 5.0-litre V8 thrumbling away happily to itself. There is very little I don’t love about this car, but what strikes you most is how the entire car is configured as a support system to that engine.

Other cars aren’t like this: drive an Alpine A110 and you’ll realise within yards that its engine exists as a tool, an enabler you use to make the most of its exquisite chassis. The Mustang is the reverse because, although Ford offers a four-cylinder engine for those poor souls who merely want the image of driving a Mustang, it realised from the day the pony car was invented in 1964 that the V8 has been the key to its character. To drive one without a V8 is to defeat its point as completely as drinking alcohol-free beer or decaffeinated coffee.

And now the V8 is dying. You may look at all those V8-powered AudisBentleys, BMWs, Ferraris, JaguarsLand RoversMaseratis, McLarensMercedes and Porsches and wonder what I think I’m talking about. And I guess what I mean when I say the V8 is dying, I mean the V8 in its natural and naturally aspirated state. Fitted to cars on sale in the UK, Ford has this one, Lexus has another, Maserati has a third – but only while its ancient Gran Turismo remains in production – and, of course, Chevrolet still uses V8s in the Corvette and Camaro. But that’s it. Time was when every single manufacturer named above (save McLaren, which didn’t exist) had normally aspirated V8s in volume production. They’ve all gone in the interest of the lower on-paper emissions, higher specific outputs and instant-gratification torque curves that turbocharged motors provide. By comparison, that noise is not much of a priority to most, any more than is the samurai-sword-sharp throttle response. You can have the power, torque and noise with supercharging, of course, and Jaguar Land Rover does, but not for very much longer.

Although we may not know why the V8 sounds so mellifluous to our ears, we know exactly what was done to it to make it that way. Just as Percy Spencer never intended to invent the microwave oven when he walked past a magnetron with a bar of chocolate in his pocket and had to change his strides, so those who first started designing cross-plane crankshafts for V8s did so for reasons that had nothing to do with creating that noise.

The truth is that V8s didn’t always sound that way, and some still don’t. Racing and ultra-high-performance V8s, such as those used by Ferrari and McLaren, have the same simple crankshaft layout as the very first V8s, conceived before World War I. The problem with their so-called flat-plane configuration is you get double the secondary vibration of a four-cylinder engine, because that’s essentially what they are: two four-cylinder engines sharing the same crankshaft. And in America between the wars, as engines grew bigger to provide the power required to do the enormous distances at reasonable speeds, so the problem just got worse.

But by spacing the firing intervals at 90 degrees rather than 180 degrees and creating a crankshaft shaped like a cross when looked at end-on, these issues all go away or, more accurately, are reduced to a point where they are no longer problematic. So why aren’t race engines designed this way? Because left unattended, a cross-plane V8 would rock itself right out of the engine bay and across the road at the first decent blip of the throttle. Happily, this tendency can be addressed by the use of counterbalance weights, but, weights being weights, they are heavy and add to an engine’s inertia. Which is why cross-plane V8s weigh more, are less willing to rev and generate less power than flat-plane V8s. But they do sound gorgeous…

Few more than this one. You see, a decent V8 is not just a sound: it is a constantly changing variation on a much-loved theme. The Mustang sounds one way when you blip the throttle to equalise the revs on a downchange and another when you do the same, but parked at the traffic lights, just because you can. It makes one glorious noise at 5000rpm with your foot hard down, quite another as it passes back through 5000rpm on the overrun and a third if you just hold it there, as you might when balancing the throttle mid-corner.

There’s something else, too, about the unadorned V8: it has a simple honesty to it, a blue-collar kind of class that’s not just charming but also effective. When Ford met Ferrari at Le Mans in 1966, the Scuderia brought its gorgeous P3 with its jewel-like light-alloy V12 engine with four overhead camshafts, six twin-choke carburettors and twin ignition. Ford? All it had was an old cast-iron pushrod V8 fed by a single Holley carb. But while the Ferrari engine was a svelte 4.0-litre motor, Ford waded into battle with 7.0 litres. And that was the kind of advantage all the cylinders, camshafts and carburettors in the world was never going to overcome. Ford came first, second and third, while all the factory Ferraris broke trying to keep up. Never did that American adage ‘There ain’t no replacement for displacement’ ring truer.

But they didn’t have turbochargers in 1966, and today turbos have proven a very effective replacement for the normally aspirated V8. Some turbo V8s – and I’m talking those with cross-plane cranks – are immensely effective and sound pretty wonderful, none more so than those made by Mercedes, and while these are objectively way better engines than they would have been without forced induction, you don’t need long in the Mustang to be reminded of what has been lost, too.

I expect that in 10 years, the only normally aspirated V8s left in production will exist for novelty value, if at all. And we’ll be walking down the street, hear that far-off thunder as some old crock with a bent eight breathing at atmospheric pressure rumbles past and we’ll mourn something else that has been lost from the joy of motoring in the interest of ‘progress’. For now, though, it’s all very well to read and write about proper V8s, but there’s nothing to compare with having one at your command. So if you’ll forgive me, and while I still can, I’m going to stop scribbling, fire up the ’Stang and go for one last blast.

Join the debate

Comments
37

3 November 2018

 Yes, I agree, the rumbling sound of an American V8 always turns your Head to see and hear the Car go by,but, now V4, V6’s produce as much if not more torque and power and some do make a great noise, they’re even decent on fuel too, but 14 yrs or so we’re going to lose them too, so we’d better enjoy them now....!

Peter Cavellini.

3 November 2018
Peter Cavellini wrote:

 Yes, I agree, the rumbling sound of an American V8 always turns your Head to see and hear the Car go by,but, now V4, V6’s produce as much if not more torque and power and some do make a great noise, they’re even decent on fuel too, but 14 yrs or so we’re going to lose them too, so we’d better enjoy them now....!

Peter Cavellini.

3 November 2018
I thought Autocar had lost its way, constantly forgetting about what got some of us into cars at an young age.

Nice to see there are still some car enthusiasts at autocar. Thanks Andrew Frankel, that was a very nice read.

3 November 2018
Spot on. A rare Autocar article I absolutely relate to.

A love of the intangible. That is proper love.

FMS

3 November 2018
eseaton wrote:

Spot on. A rare Autocar article I absolutely relate to. A love of the intangible. That is proper love.

 

"Proper" love...this needs context and qualification...are you up to the task of providing these things?.

3 November 2018

I can pinpoint the exact moment I became a petrolhead - my dad's brand new metallic silver Rover SD1 3.5 V8 being delivered and being taken for a lesson in oversteer in the snow! The sound, the futuristic looks and that rear wheel drive chassis taking every corner sideways on! It wasn't loud (in that car) but the character of that engine remains with me to this day!

 

ResteCalme

 

4 November 2018
Ubberfrancis44 wrote:

I thought Autocar had lost its way, constantly forgetting about what got some of us into cars at an young age. Nice to see there are still some car enthusiasts at autocar. Thanks Andrew Frankel, that was a very nice read.

Hear hear!....and not one mention of the Mustangs interior plastics...hallelujah!

3 November 2018

And rarer still is the naturally aspirated V8 attached to a manual gearbox. Only Ford offer us this wonderful configuration in RHD, although GM still provide two alternatives if you dont mind being on the wrong side. 

How long can Ford still import cars with a CO2 figure near 300g/km when they need to hit an average of under 100g/km? I hope its a good while yet.

289

3 November 2018

I couldnt agree more Andrew.

I have two (petrol) V8's in my stable (both naturally aspirated), and my previous V8 is still in the family giving sterling service with a quarter of a million miles on the clock.

Lazy effortless power on long journeys, pleasing soundtrack and great gobs of torque when needed. Even fuel consumption isnt nearly as some would have you believe - 26-28 mpg regulary seen on brim to brim trips. I can live with that.

I dont have anything with Yankee iron in it any more....the last was my AC, and I still miss its raw uncultured sound. But sadly it had to go for the sake of practicality and lack of real use...not to mention its stupid value.

My options for continued V8 ownership are narrowing now in 4x4 form, unless I am prepared to accept a brace of turbo's which I dont fancy much...unecessary and potentially troublesome.

Even the Cayenne GTS is a V6 Turbo now....maybe the last of the V8 GTS's would fit the bill?

3 November 2018

shows exactly why EV's will never be the answer, a V8 or a milkfloat.. 

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week